Cum-Clean-Now.com

Part III

Because in all of the stratagems there is a double bind-  a can’t have one without the other conundrum, one can feel like one is chasing one’s tail, or living the chicken and the egg enigma.  Does anyone recall the commercial where the guy in a suit is pacing a small room saying to himself, “I have to work hard, so I can buy more coke, so I work harder, and I can buy more coke, so I can work hard, to buy more coke …..?????

As this is the finale in the series on the Mindfuck some slaves, as a consequence of reading parts one and two, should be able to recognize slavishness as addictive. I have mentioned plentiful times before that in a double bind you are without escape, you are a victim of hating the thing you love and loving the thing you hate.  Unbeknownst to the slave this source of relief- and stability in its feedback loop, is a self constructed ideology for coping with life.  It is in itself, a mock escape for the slave.

In fantasy slaves are provided temporary relief from stress.  Through fantasy slaves opt to forfeit their own powers by submitting to the power of “the other.”  The male slave is led on a penile leash and through coercion, convinces himself that the way out is through masochism, submission and masturbation, .  Rather than assert his freedom to make choices, the slave succumbs to the proxy control of shifting between the one aspect of the bind and the other.  From this the slave thrives as the slave he is.

Like the drug addict in the above scenario slaves are in need of their fix, craving the very things they fear and at times despise, yet that they strongly identify with and idolize.  And with continuous access to the internet, slaves enjoy the down spiral to an auto-eroticized asexuality conditioned through chronic wanking.  I believe this clarifies the difference between homo and hetero sexuality and fetishistic- the energy is not emitted for two way communication, it is self contained, cyclic and regenerated for the purpose and maintenance of the addiction which is indeed programmed and- programmable.

In the conditioning of animals, experiments are conducted to strengthen responses to desired outcomes.  Yes they can cause animals to avoid shock treatment the same way Watson caused the baby to fear the rabbit, but they achieve something else.  With repeated exposure, stimuli no matter how aversive at the onset, later becomes opposite, becomes pleasurable. 

Now you say, “well that’s because the subject gets used to it.”  Yes that is part of it, but it doesn’t explain why the once feared effect is now greatly anticipated.  The reality that pleasure comes after the removal of the aversive stimulus is more on target. 

How many of you slaves know this feeling?  This “opponent process” is highly addictive for this reason.  The subject gets hooked on the high that comes once the aversive stimuli is terminated. Ever hear that people work harder to avoid pain than to seek pleasure.  This is one reason that supports that statement is true.

Now what about positive stimuli and pleasure seeking.  A drug, like love, is so great at first you just can’t get enough.  But we all know the high doesn’t last and with continuous usage becomes aversive, so how does this matter of pleasure/aversion become addictive? 

Yes the slave/addict needs larger quantities of substance to maintain the high is true, but there is something more.  Because the slave would rather suffer the cause of his affliction repeatedly than withstand the pain of breaking the addiction is the bulls eye.  The withdrawal is worse than the abstinence. The slave rushes back to it, seeks it out again in time with the keenly sensed deprivation.  The slave then avidly avoids enduring the time it takes to be free of it and continues to suffer.  That’s why it is formally known as HELLO, a slave process.  I shit you not.

Just writing that sentence makes Me feel the power that comes with a working knowledge of the Opponent Process theory.  It is so insidious in nature once in its grip humans are utterly powerless to avoid it.  It literally brings out the beast in our kind in the inferior sense.  It accounts for the weakness of the human spirit, what Becker says is   “the problem of personal freedom vs. species vulnerability.”

So for the sake of My own experimentation, I build this case for educating slaves to the fact that the Goddess speaks the truth, knows all, and tells all, like a leather clad Jeanine Piro or a rubber bound Judge Judy (who wants to see her ugly mug).  I offer as exhibit  A  the most abhorrent fetish of them all.  I use it not only to drive the point home hard -like dick in your ass- and to get Myself off here, but also to be succinct.  Remember I am trying to teach you without a lot of verbiage that so called experts use.  Ready?

Shiteaters eat shit why? Because they like the taste? 

Oh you are so grossed out right now aren’t you……No you’re not ……you wana hear more-  especially those with a fetish for it – at least they have cum clean in their own minds, but outwardly, NO WAY.  Imagine having a fetish that you are afraid other fetishists will scorn you for……  Hahahahaaaaaaa- Ironic isn’t it!  That’s what makes the shiteater My favorite of all slaves.  They are especially pathetic – especially prideful people on the outside….. babhahhaaaaa haaaaa!   Can you hear My laughter!  you know who you are!

 Cum clean pervs from hell!

Ok I am beginning to breath  heavy, I am getting moist and must finish here.  The opponent process is a devious behavioral strategy when combined with Money’s stratagems.  The opponent process explains perfectly why the stratagems are impossible to abandon making the fetishist forever bound and enslaved by this proven, addictive, slave process. 

 Here is Money’s brilliantly complicated synopsis from page 144 in Gay Straight and in Between:  Compulsory and unyielding obedience to the injunctions and demands of a paraphilic lovemap is in the same category as obedience to that which, originally polarized as aversive, reverses polarity, and is repolarized as addictive.  In paraphilia, it is not sex as a whole that is repolarized, but a very specific stimulus to arousal……..paraphilic masochism exemplifies the conversion of eroticized humiliation and punishment into an addictive lust for humiliation and punishment…..

Swallow that down bitches quickly to avoid the taste of his nasty load and get set to slowly savor Mine.

My field observation slaves:

After reading Richard Solomon’s paper, The opponent process theory of acquired motivation: The cost of pleasure and the benefits of pain, several times it has made Me understand why slaves do what they don’t want to do and keep right on doing it.   To give this another perspective I will angle from their paper and use the example of what they call “the mini addiction” ie. non stop eating of snax while sitting at a bar.  Because the snax are available you engage in endless consumption until they are gone.  When you don’t have any more the urge eventually subsides, sort of like out of site out of mind yes, but there’s there’s more to it.  Solomon postulates that since there was not enough time for the stimulus to take hold with repeated action, the desire disappears, fades to extinction.  This is why any behavior is believed to be conditionable to extinction or programmable to rehabilitation by strengthening a response with repeated action whether the action be using or abstaining. 

In Watson’s experiments with lil albert it was believed to be harmless in the long run because the child wouldn’t maintain aversion to rabbits without the original stimulus- the loud strike of the bell, present. Could other things sneak in and condition him to fear bunnies in place of the bell, to make him avoid animals altogether? Sure. They are called operants, and are conditioned through positive and negative reinforcement and are the basis for Skinner’s brand of behaviorism, operant conditioning.  Operant conditioning is a factor in the maintenance of any addiction.  It is discussed in depth in the paper.  It is beyond the scope of this discussion- but not beyond the concept -as reward and punishment is the back bone of  BDSM  ideology as well as behaviorism and is a tenet of the philosophy I am trying to formulate in writing these posts.  So………….

So is shiteating conditionable?  Based on what I have presented here anyone would have to agree that the answer is yes, with consistent and tactful conditioning a slave would cum to consume it.  However, without the proper conditioning tools, which must come from the slaves own unique developmental experiences, the experiment would fail.  On the other hand, combining repeated operant conditioning with one of Money’s stratagems according to the opponent process theory, success is highly probable.  The mental maneuver is already  ingrained in the slave and is just waiting to be exploited for any devious dominants satisfaction.  And now I have revealed a key to being a successful strategist and Master.  And I said it quite simply too I believe. 

BUT ALSO, upon conclusion, I must take this opportunity to rub your nose in this to reiterate the meaning in My first and most popular post for all  those shiteating slaves. YOU ASKED FOR IT!   Something happened long ago that you have repressed that makes a natural shit eater out of you, NOT ME.  And you will never be free if it just like the rest of you wana be slutslaves won’t be free of your lil secret wishes either.

NOT UNTIL YOU CUM CLEAN instead of dirty bitches!

The power has made Me horney.  Studies into traditional sadism be damned…..I am a sadistic altruist.  As Becker says on page 154 in The Denial of Death, “ the sadist doesn’t create the masochist- he finds him readymade.”  uuuuUH!

I think I just came.

Copyright 2010 Cum-Clean-Now.com

2 Responses to “Atomic Mindfuck- the finale”